It's hard for my to explain the difference between the reading and listening passage by sequence. I don't integrate them well. Also, time is hard to control. Anyway, please give me some suggestions for this one, thanks.
The speaker in the listening passage casts doubt on the thesis which is released by the reading passage. The speaker mentions that pro-social behavior can also be leaded by the deindividualization and polarization. Contrary to the opinions that deindividualizaton and polarization will lead to antisocial behavior in the reading passage.
First, the speaker indicates that people who share the same or similar emotion feelings might express the behavior of pro-socialization. These people will make a group and express their emotion to the public or even release some kindness to the society. However, it is against the opinion in the reading passage in which the author considers that people tend to act differ and express their anti-socialization when they group together.
Another example the speaker mentions is that it's human nature that people always feel excited about the victory of poor persons that means they will get the same feelings when come across these situations. The speaker calls this pro-social behavior, and this is opposite of the so called antisocial behavior in reading passage in which the author believe this exciting feeling always causes destruction or violent events.
Last but not least, the speaker provides another example to explain the polarization which can also be related to pro-social behavior. In her view, polarization can be performed by people who suffer from the bully around them, such as the bad guys in the city or a mean supervisor. The reason for them grouping together is to deal with the bullies. Contrary to what the reading passage confirm that people in groups act extremely crazy from them are individuals.
To sum up, the speaker considers deindividulization and polarization as the behavior of pro-socialization, while the reading passage looks the different side and holds the belief that they lead to the situation of antisocial behavior.
2 comments:
Feedbacks from Joseph:
1.Wendy basically your article is completed and organized , but as you have said ＂time is hard to control ＂, for my first impression of your article is that you can delete some of the paragraphs that is unnecessary or repeated for the sake of time. You don’t actually need to
make a conclusion in the end, I think it is okay.
2.I think that you can just focus on the details and examples mentioned in the listening to organize your article, I mean, you can specify the pro-social behavior examples as a focus. You don’t have to compare or
emphasize the difference of anti-social behavior and pro-social behavior in every paragraph. Maybe at first just to specify the two different views then add the information to what the question has asked.
3.I think you can combine the second and third paragraph together for make it short, that will make the article more clear.
4. wendy you explain the two ideas of pro and anti, but mostly on the comparison of two views. Maybe you can cite the exact details of examples to add more information.I mean, the facts are important.
sorry!wendy i dont think you need to integrate the listening and reading passage.
Post a Comment